Lachlan Mcfadzean vs Haruto Ishikawa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 Sep at 03:45 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Mcfadzean vs H. Ishikawa

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mcfadzean 1 - 0 Ishikawa
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lachlan Mcfadzean winning 2 and Haruto Ishikawa winning 0. The last match between Lachlan Mcfadzean and Haruto Ishikawa was at the M25 Tamworth, 09-09-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Lachlan Mcfadzean getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mcfadzean | 1 |
| Ishikawa | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M25 Tamworth(09-09-25)
L. Mcfadzean vs H. Ishikawa H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.57% (15-13) | Career Total W/L | 33.33% (5-10) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Mcfadzean vs H. Ishikawa Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Ishikawa has struggled significantly with their second serve, winning 0% of points compared to Mcfadzean's much stronger 44.64% win rate. Could this impact the outcome? Highly likely.
- Return Game Stats: Ishikawa has failed to win points on their opponent's second serve and first serve returns, whereas Mcfadzean has a respective success rate of 37.69% and 30.2%. A clear edge for Mcfadzean. Who is more likely to capitalize on return opportunities? Mcfadzean, based on recent form.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Ishikawa has not saved any breakpoints recently, while Mcfadzean has managed to save 52.38%. This suggests Mcfadzean might handle pressure situations better.
- Performance Overview: In general match outcomes over the past year, Ishikawa has a slightly higher win percentage at 57.14% compared to Mcfadzean's 50%, but their competition level differs.
- Best Surface: Both players have their best win percentage on Hard courts; Ishikawa at 44% and Mcfadzean at 59%. Mcfadzean seems to have a better overall performance on this surface.
- Player Level: Both players have competed mostly at the $10K ITF/Futures/Satellites level, with Ishikawa slightly ahead in win percentage. Does experience against tougher opponents favor anyone? Perhaps Mcfadzean, considering their average opponent rank of 192.9.
- Opponent Quality: Mcfadzean's experience against higher-ranked opponents may offer better preparation for challenging matches.
- Deciding Set Performance: Interestingly, Ishikawa has won 100% of their deciding sets over the past year, whereas Mcfadzean has not managed a single win. Could this be a wildcard factor?
- Break Point Conversion: Mcfadzean converts 12% of break points, giving them a tactical advantage over Ishikawa, who converts none.
Editorial Prediction (September 8, 2025, UTC):
In assessing the upcoming match between Ishikawa and Mcfadzean, several factors stand out that could significantly influence the outcome.
Mcfadzean's ability to perform better on second serves and their adeptness at saving breakpoints suggests a more consistent and resilient playing style under pressure. Their return game stats give them an undeniable edge, particularly against an opponent who has struggled in this area.
While Ishikawa shows a perfect record in deciding sets, Mcfadzean's experience against higher-ranked opponents implies a potential to manage tougher competitive settings despite their current slump in decisive matches.
Given Mcfadzean's superior handling of crucial points and stronger historical performance on hard surfaces, they are the likely favorite to secure a victory in this encounter.
Lachlan Mcfadzean vs Haruto Ishikawa Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Mcfadzean vs H. Ishikawa H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:54:30 | Average Match Time | 1:54:30 |
| 72% (44/61) | 1st Serve % | 70% (43/61) |
| 68% (30/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (23/43) |
| 47% (8/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (7/18) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 60% (3/5) |
| 51% (31/61) | Return Points Win % | 38% (23/61) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Mcfadzean Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-0 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
H. Ishikawa Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q2 | W | 2-6 6-0 10-7 | ||
Q1 | W | 2-6 6-2 10-6 | ||

L. Mcfadzean vs H. Ishikawa Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.57% (15/13) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (5/10) |
| 58.33% (35/25) | Sets Win/Loss | 31.25% (10/22) |
| 54.94% (306/251) | Games Win/Loss | 41.97% (115/159) |
| 59.09% (13/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 41.67% (5/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 35 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.01 |
| 21 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 198.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 65.07 |
| 67% (421/632) | 1st Serve % | 69% (69/100) |
| 67% (282/421) | 1st Serve Win % | 43% (30/69) |
| 45% (95/211) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (9/31) |
| 31% (16/51) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (4/6) |
| 35% (222/628) | Return Points Win % | 33% (29/87) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 53.57% (15/13) | Futures W/L | 35.71% (5/9) |
| 54% (14/26) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (5/15) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 88% (17/15) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (3/3) |
| 12% (17/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (3/0) |
| 0% (11/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (12/2) |